The Honorable Robert La Russa
Acting Undersecretary for International
Trade
United States Department of Commerce
14th Street & Constitution Avenue,
N.W., Room 350
Washington DC 20230
Re: Proposed International Safe Harbor Data Privacy Principles
Dear Undersecretary La Russa:
This letter responds to the International
Trade Administration's request for comments on the March 17, 2000 "International
Safe Harbor Privacy Principles," which include the "Frequently Asked Questions."
As we have done in prior submissions on
this matter, IBM wishes to express appreciation for the efforts of the
International Trade Administration and the Commerce Department to create
a framework for use by US organizations to comply with Article 25 of the
European Union Data Protection Directive. We strongly support your ongoing
efforts, as well as those of the European Union's, to finalize the Safe
Harbor framework in the May-June timeframe. We also applaud your willingness
to continue constructive discussions with the EU on additional implementation
issues.
As to the March 17 draft package, we would
submit the following two requests for clarification:
· Introduction
to the Principles
As we understand the intent of the new
ending to the second paragraph, it is to confirm that organizations operating
within the European Union are covered by the applicable law of the Member
State. However, it is also understood that transfers of personal data outside
of the EU to the United States would, if the organization enrolled in the
Safe Harbor, be covered by the Safe Harbor framework. We would appreciate
confirmation of this understanding, and anticipate it being enunciated
by the documents to be issued by the European Union.
· Cooperation
with Data Protection Authorities (FAQ 5)
Under the Safe Harbor draft, organizations
may choose to cooperate with the relevant Data Protection Authorities as
a means of compliance with the Enforcement Principle. This is an important
element of the Safe Harbor framework, and should be implemented via deliberate
and fair processes in order to protect the interests of both European data
subjects and US organizations. We therefore respectfully request that the
Department of Commerce clarify that the process set out in FAQ 5 requires
that the Data Protection Authorities advising US organizations that choose
this option, do so in the form of a reasoned opinion, particularly when
finding a lack of compliance with the Safe Harbor commitment. In addition,
when the relevant US governmental agencies receive a referral from the
Data Protection Authorities' panel, these agencies must be able to review
all of the information relevant to the decisionmaking, and decide upon
that basis.
Thank you for your consideration of these
comments and best wishes for continued constructive and fruitful discussions
with the European Union on this matter.
Sincerely,
Harriet P. Pearson
Director, Public Affairs
IBM Corporation
1301 K Street, N.W. Suite 1200
Washington, D.C. 20005
202-515-5036
hpearson@us.ibm.com